From: Patrick Kelly <kameo76890@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Are we ready for DNSSEC ?
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 10:14:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <429BB192-1F75-44F3-AC67-730F152E4C29@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58dec826cbba066ea2cf1362ffa28e96@brasstown.quanstro.net>
On Jan 20, 2010, at 8:42 AM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
wrote:
> On Wed Jan 20 08:27:58 EST 2010, maht-9fans@maht0x0r.net wrote:
>> By the end of May, all the root servers should be running DNSSEC
>>
>> http://royal.pingdom.com/2010/01/19/the-internet-is-about-to-get-a-lot-safer/
>>
>> Is Plan9 ready for such a move?
>
> there are two answers to this:
>
> yes, if you mean by this that plan 9 dns will continue to
> operate.
>
> no, if you mean by this that plan 9 dns will be able to use
> or serve dnssec records.
>
> one would likely need to start with a different structure
> than ndb/dns currently has to get dnssec. but i think that
> the most of the query logic could be reused.
As I understand it; It is an extension, the base DNS stuff should not
change.
What would need to be changed in ndb, or would looking at the source
be better?
>
> - erik
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-20 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-20 13:26 maht
2010-01-20 13:42 ` erik quanstrom
2010-01-20 15:14 ` Patrick Kelly [this message]
2010-01-20 15:33 ` erik quanstrom
2010-01-20 16:39 ` Patrick Kelly
2010-01-20 16:49 ` erik quanstrom
2010-01-20 17:29 ` Patrick Kelly
2010-01-20 17:47 ` Russ Cox
2010-01-20 18:17 ` erik quanstrom
2010-01-20 20:11 ` Russ Cox
2010-01-20 19:13 ` Patrick Kelly
2010-01-23 23:59 ` John Barham
2010-01-24 0:42 ` erik quanstrom
2010-01-24 0:52 ` Russ Cox
2010-01-24 1:01 ` erik quanstrom
2010-01-24 1:11 ` Russ Cox
2010-01-24 1:18 ` erik quanstrom
2010-01-24 13:19 ` hiro
2010-01-24 14:57 ` erik quanstrom
2010-01-24 21:49 ` Russ Cox
2010-01-24 22:12 ` Tim Newsham
2010-01-24 22:20 ` erik quanstrom
2010-01-24 18:14 ` Tim Newsham
2010-01-25 20:45 ` Wes Kussmaul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=429BB192-1F75-44F3-AC67-730F152E4C29@gmail.com \
--to=kameo76890@gmail.com \
--cc=9fans@9fans.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).