From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <42ddc183e532f4ade100aa5550fb58f7@coraid.com>
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@coraid.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 08:04:38 -0500
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] Samterm up down key patch
In-Reply-To: <20061114104953.GA11151@shodan.homeunix.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Topicbox-Message-UUID: de47bd06-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Tue Nov 14 05:52:07 EST 2006, m.ne@gmx.net wrote:
> Hello,
>=20
> I'm not quite convinced of the merit of that behaviour. The most direct
> consequence is that it makes sam inconsistent with acme and rio windows=
.

that never stopped rob.

> While acme could be altered analogously, as soon as you've arrived at r=
io,
> you're halfway to readline.=20

isn't that a bit of an overreaction?  readline is tens of kloc.  but it h=
as it's=20
benefits.  how else would a linux user learn how to reboot a cpu server. =
=E2=98=BA

- erik