9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fco.J.Ballesteros <nemo@plan9.escet.urjc.es>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] odd clock behaviour
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 18:50:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <431c731706dd9f7f19f1e39a589f8979@plan9.escet.urjc.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b529fedd4dd9b2c2134daa1ff3eaf11b@plan9.bell-labs.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 67 bytes --]

If you refer to my T23, It's a 1GHz machine (according to my BIOS).

[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1573 bytes --]

From: "Russ Cox" <rsc@plan9.bell-labs.com>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] odd clock behaviour
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 12:06:54 -0500
Message-ID: <b529fedd4dd9b2c2134daa1ff3eaf11b@plan9.bell-labs.com>

If you believe the /dev/time numbers,
your processor is running at 300MHz,
which sounds plausible but not for a T23.
The clock tick numbers advanced by 160 billion
over the 100 seconds.  Is it a 1.6GHz 
machine?  That sounds more likely.

If so, we're really confused about the
clock speed.  It sounds like even though
it was plugged in it dipped down to 300MHz.

Russ

  reply	other threads:[~2003-03-13 17:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-13 14:25 rog
2003-03-13 14:30 ` Fco.J.Ballesteros
2003-03-13 15:40 ` Russ Cox
2003-03-13 16:22 ` Sam
2003-03-13 16:26   ` David Presotto
2003-03-13 17:06     ` Russ Cox
2003-03-13 17:50       ` Fco.J.Ballesteros [this message]
2003-03-13 18:39 ` Dan Cross
2003-03-13 18:40 ` Dan Cross
2003-03-13 14:43 rog
2003-03-13 18:06 rog
2003-03-13 18:43 David Presotto
2003-03-13 18:58 rog
2003-03-13 19:15 ` David Presotto
2003-03-13 19:25   ` Russ Cox
2003-03-20 18:07 rog

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=431c731706dd9f7f19f1e39a589f8979@plan9.escet.urjc.es \
    --to=nemo@plan9.escet.urjc.es \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).