From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <433F1DC4.80005@lanl.gov>
Date: Sat,  1 Oct 2005 17:37:40 -0600
From: Ronald G Minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] 64-Bit programming model.
References: <7f085f360f023a33916061a56b26c515@terzarima.net>
In-Reply-To: <7f085f360f023a33916061a56b26c515@terzarima.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: quanstro@speakeasy.net
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 937b1e2c-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Charles Forsyth wrote:

> i know.  i was being sarcastic, especially since i've been wading
> (verb doesn't quite capture the feeling) through linux kernel headers and code.
> 


ooh, yeah. When is a function call not a function call? When, after 
wading through 6 or 8 .h files, you find it is
#define x()

Well, admittedly, linux has a lot of tough problems to solve, but I just 
can't get myself to like this style.

ron