From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:10:15 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <43753423e1d13c42e5a6d0feb69f52d9@brasstown.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <CADSkJJURoTSsuNHWpHb6=yWvQh9-DpQ3h+nMxC=s0AdYUj-h_A@mail.gmail.c>
References: <16d20c29be00a62eacb3dba96a700922@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<CADSkJJV_C6qrqDDXgRm0jPwRWoX2-YckOCf1bMati625Co5CMg@mail.gmail.c>
	<44a20375d50e77dfb05d75c5ab989474@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<CADSkJJVeG7ZqCpnqVd0SvRhKmnWUrewX04kYVX-VTUb50Uemqw@mail.gmail.c>
	<12d49fddae516ea31fe10407d7547b06@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<CADSkJJURoTSsuNHWpHb6=yWvQh9-DpQ3h+nMxC=s0AdYUj-h_A@mail.gmail.c>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [9fans] what am i missing
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7f99d900-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Wed Apr 25 17:01:18 EDT 2012, rsc@swtch.com wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:37 PM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>=
 wrote:
> > On Wed Apr 25 16:15:27 EDT 2012, rsc@swtch.com wrote:
> >> This is not Linux. =C2=A0Each individual proc (thread) has its own
> >> set of children, so the only wait message that should arrive
> >
> > and yet the threadwaitchan() is shared among all threads in all
> > procs, no?
>=20
> Yes, of course, but I don't understand why that is relevant.
> We were talking about whether _schedexecwait should ever
> get a Waitmsg with w->pid !=3D pid that is not okay to throw
> on the floor.  Did you actually observe a problem using the
> thread library?  If so, an actual test program would be great.

no, i was confused.  there is no bug.

the reason i'm noting that everything gets tossed on the same
channel with disappointment is that the idea was to create pairs
of processes sources (procrfork/procexecl) and proc sinks
(wait; but that doesn't work) so the total number outstanding/rate/
processor use could be managed independently for each. =20

- erik