[9fans] etherrhine vs ethervt6102

9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

* [9fans] etherrhine vs ethervt6102
@ 2005-11-13 17:50 "Nils O. Selåsdal"
  2005-11-13 18:54 ` jmk
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: "Nils O. Selåsdal" @ 2005-11-13 17:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

Seems some people, me included, have (had) problems with the
etherrhine driver.
Should the pc* kernel configs be updated to
include the vt6102 driver instead ?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [9fans] etherrhine vs ethervt6102
  2005-11-13 17:50 [9fans] etherrhine vs ethervt6102 "Nils O. Selåsdal"
@ 2005-11-13 18:54 ` jmk
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: jmk @ 2005-11-13 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 9fans

Thanks. We talked about that recently and I have attempted
to make the change.

--jim

On Sun Nov 13 12:52:03 EST 2005, noselasd@asgaard.homelinux.org wrote:
> Seems some people, me included, have (had) problems with the
> etherrhine driver.
> Should the pc* kernel configs be updated to
> include the vt6102 driver instead ?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-11-13 18:54 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-11-13 17:50 [9fans] etherrhine vs ethervt6102 "Nils O. Selåsdal"
2005-11-13 18:54 ` jmk

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).