From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <4385.199.98.20.223.1080833219.squirrel@wish>
In-Reply-To: <81132473206F3A46A72BD6116E1A06AE479D92@black.aprote.com>
References: <81132473206F3A46A72BD6116E1A06AE479D92@black.aprote.com>
Subject: RE: [9fans] tactic
From: "Joel Salomon" <salomo3@cooper.edu>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Date: Thu,  1 Apr 2004 10:26:59 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4c0c76e2-eacd-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

Tiit Lankots said:
>> In html mail spam, some of this is in microscopic font - I
>> needed to zoom
>> to 32x to make out any words.
>
> My bayesian is trained to trigger on html. I do not receive
> non-spam html mail.
>

Good idea. This, however, was a spamtrap email address - I get *no*
non-spam email there.

I just got curious about any new tactics, and adding random
"conversational" text (probably snarfed off usenet) is a pretty clever on=
e
- expect the false positive rate to go up once you've trained your filter
on a couple of these.

--Joel