From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <438E0270.30808@lanl.gov>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 12:50:08 -0700
From: Ronald G Minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9con in Madrid?
References: <20051130164014.61635.qmail@web51103.mail.yahoo.com>	<438DE7A8.9010000@lanl.gov>
	<438DFFD3.2060105@asgaard.homelinux.org>
In-Reply-To: <438DFFD3.2060105@asgaard.homelinux.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b4585e20-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Nils O. Sel=E5sdal wrote:
> Ronald G Minnich wrote:
>=20
>> Kenneth Long wrote:
>>
>>>>>> Plan 9 future development plans and goals.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> that one is kind of nebulous.
>>
>>
>>
>> because for every person on this list it has a different meaning. I=20
>> think.
>=20
>=20
> I disagree.

well, case in point.. for me, our future development includes xcpu and=20
clustering. Others think xcpu is a horrible mistake. So, in that case at=20
least, 'the future' has a very different meaning.

do you really think that 'Plan 9 future development plans and goals' is=20
really the same for everyone? Or are you saying that is has a future (i=20
don't think everyone agrees even on that :-)

or do we agree but think we disagree?

ron