From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <438E03B0.3020000@asgaard.homelinux.org> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 20:55:28 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22Nils_O=2E_Sel=E5sdal=22?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] 9con in Madrid? References: <20051130164014.61635.qmail@web51103.mail.yahoo.com> <438DE7A8.9010000@lanl.gov> <438DFFD3.2060105@asgaard.homelinux.org> <438E0270.30808@lanl.gov> In-Reply-To: <438E0270.30808@lanl.gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Topicbox-Message-UUID: b45d916a-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 Ronald G Minnich wrote: > Nils O. Sel=E5sdal wrote: >=20 >> Ronald G Minnich wrote: >> >>> Kenneth Long wrote: >>> >>>>>>> Plan 9 future development plans and goals. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> that one is kind of nebulous. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> because for every person on this list it has a different meaning. I=20 >>> think. >> >> >> >> I disagree. >=20 >=20 > well, case in point.. for me, our future development includes xcpu and=20 > clustering. Others think xcpu is a horrible mistake. So, in that case a= t=20 > least, 'the future' has a very different meaning. >=20 > do you really think that 'Plan 9 future development plans and goals' is= =20 > really the same for everyone? Or are you saying that is has a future (i= =20 > don't think everyone agrees even on that :-) >=20 > or do we agree but think we disagree? Sorry to be an idiot at subtle sarcasm/puns. We agree on it having different meaning, and I do think it has a future.