From: Ronald G Minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Maybe it is april fool's after all ...
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:36:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43D11F96.3050406@lanl.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3e1162e60601200933r3c5ea53at8eb24c5501dea579@mail.gmail.com>
David Leimbach wrote:
> On 1/20/06, Devon H. O'Dell <devon.odell@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>The specific reason many Linuxes do this is for i386 compat on AMD64
>>architectures. It's horribly broken, but is only slightly worse than
>>the way FreeBSD implements it, which is to have /usr/lib32
>>
>>--Devon
>>
>
>
> Funny, the linux distros I've used have "/usr/lib64" SUSE was one
> that used this, but then again, I must admit, I don't use linux
> anywhere near as much as I used to.
>
/usr/lib64 &tc. is very, very common linuxices. I would prefer /usr/lib32.
recompilation is not a common option on linux, which has tons of
something we don't see much on plan 9: third party software.
ron
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-20 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-19 17:54 Ronald G Minnich
2006-01-19 20:43 ` Charles Forsyth
2006-01-19 22:28 ` Bruce Ellis
2006-01-20 11:58 ` Devon H. O'Dell
2006-01-20 16:08 ` jmk
2006-01-20 16:13 ` andrey mirtchovski
2006-01-20 22:19 ` Paweł Lasek
2006-01-21 4:01 ` jmk
2006-01-21 4:06 ` Bruce Ellis
2006-01-21 4:26 ` erik quanstrom
2006-01-21 5:09 ` jmk
2006-01-21 6:20 ` uriel
2006-01-21 8:36 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2006-01-21 7:42 ` Bruce Ellis
2006-01-21 13:09 ` Brantley Coile
2006-01-21 16:37 ` Ronald G. Minnich
2006-01-21 18:49 ` Bruce Ellis
2006-01-21 19:43 ` David Leimbach
2006-01-21 21:13 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2006-01-21 13:11 ` Brantley Coile
2006-01-20 17:33 ` David Leimbach
2006-01-20 17:36 ` Ronald G Minnich [this message]
2006-01-20 17:53 ` jmk
2006-01-20 18:10 ` Dave Lukes
2006-01-20 18:38 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2006-01-21 19:29 ` Marina Brown
2006-01-20 20:14 ` Ronald G Minnich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43D11F96.3050406@lanl.gov \
--to=rminnich@lanl.gov \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).