From: Ronald G Minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] fuse bashing
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 13:33:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43D53D9F.90702@lanl.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3e1162e60601231231r5e95b657x99e9070d17802734@mail.gmail.com>
David Leimbach wrote:
> I don't know too much about the limitations of 9P... and this choir
> isn't likely to sing them [no offense but it is called 9fans after
> all]
The big complaints I know of so far on 9P are
- there is no posix file locking (sorry, but people want it) although
the 'only allow one open at a time' is a pretty damned good substitute
- no ACLs (I'm convinced that the stat and wstat could be trivially
extended to support this --- 9p2000.acl)
- doesn't fit linux vfs semantics too well (just a joke, son, but true
too -- sometimes you have to fit a good thing onto a broken thing)
That's about all I've hit so far. I spent about 5 years hacking on nfs,
and I have to say 9p is a way better protocol.
ron
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-23 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-23 17:06 Russ Cox
2006-01-23 17:28 ` Ronald G Minnich
2006-01-23 17:44 ` David Leimbach
2006-01-23 18:07 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2006-01-23 18:13 ` Bruce Ellis
2006-01-23 20:31 ` David Leimbach
2006-01-23 20:33 ` Ronald G Minnich [this message]
2006-01-23 23:28 ` Dan Cross
2006-01-23 23:53 ` David Leimbach
2006-01-24 0:07 ` Ronald G Minnich
2006-01-25 19:58 ` Enache Adrian
2006-01-25 20:30 ` Christoph Lohmann
2006-01-25 20:51 ` Ronald G Minnich
2006-01-25 21:09 ` Bruce Ellis
2006-01-25 20:50 ` Ronald G Minnich
2006-01-25 21:09 ` Enache Adrian
2006-01-24 0:12 ` John Barham
2006-01-25 5:29 ` Dave Eckhardt
2006-01-25 15:38 ` Ronald G Minnich
2006-01-25 21:31 ` Dave Eckhardt
2006-01-26 1:16 ` erik quanstrom
2006-01-25 5:30 ` Dave Eckhardt
2006-01-25 7:46 ` Jack Johnson
2006-01-25 8:11 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2006-01-25 8:18 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2006-01-25 9:46 ` Andriy G. Tereshchenko
2006-01-25 15:45 ` Ronald G Minnich
2006-01-23 17:51 ` C H Forsyth
2006-01-23 17:46 ` David Leimbach
2006-01-23 20:08 ` Ronald G Minnich
2006-01-23 18:46 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2006-01-24 2:22 ` Latchesar Ionkov
2006-01-24 8:37 ` Charles Forsyth
2006-01-24 9:41 ` Charles Forsyth
2006-01-24 10:04 ` Charles Forsyth
[not found] <000001c620ca$f86f1570$14aaa8c0@utelsystems.local>
2006-01-24 9:46 ` "Nils O. Selåsdal"
2006-01-24 20:10 quanstro
2006-01-24 21:37 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
2006-01-24 23:14 ` Charles Forsyth
2006-01-25 0:26 ` Latchesar Ionkov
2006-01-25 0:25 ` Latchesar Ionkov
2006-01-25 1:31 ` erik quanstrom
2006-01-25 1:40 ` Latchesar Ionkov
2006-01-25 1:42 ` Eric Van Hensbergen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43D53D9F.90702@lanl.gov \
--to=rminnich@lanl.gov \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).