From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <43E16A57.9000807@lanl.gov>
Date: Wed,  1 Feb 2006 19:11:35 -0700
From: Ronald G Minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Van Jacobsen's network stack restructure
References: <ce472274c492c634c644c4040ebfe091@quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <ce472274c492c634c644c4040ebfe091@quanstro.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: ef025dc8-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

quanstro@quanstro.net wrote:
> c'mon. linux has consistently gone the other way on this issue.
> linux doesn't even have a device node for network interfaces.


for grins, I just did a grep, and find at least 41 options now for the 
network stack in linux.

Too many knobs for me. The # of knobs is rapidly reaching my age -- 
oops, I should not say that.

ron