From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <43E7776E.9010007@lanl.gov> Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 09:21:02 -0700 From: Ronald G Minnich User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] acme + mh References: <200602050916.k159G6Pq010539@gate.bitblocks.com> <1139224693.5522.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1139224693.5522.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Topicbox-Message-UUID: f39f2334-ead0-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 Enrique Soriano wrote: > Am I the only one using Evolution on a linux box? Why (besides the fact > that it's a xml-monster, but you are talking about Mac Mail and > Thunderbird)? Did I miss anything? I think Evolution is enough (good| > bad) for me. I was transferring my mailboxes from pine-land to evolution-land, and at some point evolution got an E2MANY. All I could guess was a missing close() somewhere in the deep tree of class libraries. That qualified it as a toy in my book. Too much of the linux-land software is of this ilk: push it a bit, it falls over. Anyway, I have taken us off-topic, sorry. I was mainly interested in whether there is a nicer mail environment for me on plan 9 than acme mail alone. It's just not quite there (for me). But it'd like to get off the stuff I use on linux becuase it is kind of painful at times. Anyway, folks, thanks for the info :-) ron