9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Tolpin <dvd@davidashen.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] libhtml vs. <pre> tags
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 22:51:37 +0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43FAE8B5-4B8D-4A03-8A1E-30B10719684F@davidashen.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e3dcc9f8ae743b2a4fa61b0d9ab81fb1@9netics.com>


On 21/10/2005, at 22:35, Skip Tavakkolian wrote:

>> Tables have always been a complete bitch in rendering HTML. Part  
>> of the problem is that it is easy to inconsistently overspecify a  
>> table (e.g., the whole table must have width 3in but there are  
>> only two columns each of which must have width 2 in), and you have  
>> to experiment with, say, Internet Explorer, to see how it resolves  
>> the problem.
>>
>
> one would think that knuth had solved it for τεχ. any of it  
> applicable to html?
>

This is specified in CSS2, clearly and unambiguously. If the sum of  
columns' widths is less than the table's width, one must increase the  
column widths so that they fill the tables width. You don't have to  
experiment with implementations to comply to the specification.  
Unless you have to deal with multipage tables, formatting table, even  
with auto-layout, is a relatively easy task.

And you don't need Knuth and TEX for that.

David

  reply	other threads:[~2005-10-21 17:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-10-21 13:47 Trickey, Howard W (Howard)
2005-10-21 13:55 ` erik quanstrom
2005-10-21 14:06 ` Wes Kussmaul
2005-10-21 14:16 ` C H Forsyth
2005-10-21 15:04 ` Uriel
2005-10-21 18:45   ` Wes Kussmaul
2005-10-21 19:12     ` Uriel
2005-10-21 19:20       ` Wes Kussmaul
2005-10-21 17:35 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2005-10-21 17:51   ` David Tolpin [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-10-21 18:16 Trickey, Howard W (Howard)
2005-10-21 14:37 Federico G. Benavento
2005-10-21 14:21 Federico G. Benavento
2005-10-21 14:40 ` C H Forsyth
2005-10-21 14:02 Federico G. Benavento
2005-10-21 14:16 ` rog
2005-10-21 14:20   ` LiteStar numnums
2005-10-21 15:09   ` Wes Kussmaul
2005-10-21 13:40 Federico G. Benavento
2005-10-21 13:51 ` erik quanstrom
2005-10-21  4:34 Federico G. Benavento
2005-10-21  5:09 ` Federico Benavento
2005-10-21  9:49   ` Kenji Okamoto
2005-10-21  9:51     ` Kenji Okamoto
2005-10-21 13:19   ` erik quanstrom
2005-10-21 13:25   ` erik quanstrom
2005-10-20  1:56 erik quanstrom
2005-10-20  2:17 ` erik quanstrom
2005-10-20 17:04   ` Federico Benavento
2005-10-21  4:01     ` erik quanstrom

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43FAE8B5-4B8D-4A03-8A1E-30B10719684F@davidashen.net \
    --to=dvd@davidashen.net \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).