From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:13:49 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <43a720345b1b95e7a3818ac782a31e6d@plug.quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <4CCDD32A.3030803@orthanc.ca>
References: <4CC85D81.60603@orthanc.ca>
	<7477907E-2C0D-4E41-80A8-7A688B19A91F@fastmail.fm>
	<4CCDD32A.3030803@orthanc.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] Non-VESA video card
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 746bd57a-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Sun Oct 31 16:37:47 EDT 2010, lyndon@orthanc.ca wrote:
> On 10-10-30 11:21 PM, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
> > I'm really curious what machine this is for.
>
> A mini-ITX system running as a diskless terminal.

if that's it, i don't understand the objections to vesa.
you can nearly buy a atom or via motherboard for the price
(in currency and power) of add-on graphics.

what's the restriction you're not telling us?

- erik