From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <44331690.2060604@coraid.com>
Date: Tue,  4 Apr 2006 21:00:00 -0400
From: Brantley Coile <brantley@coraid.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050720)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] new compilers
References: <6104d1669942e762ba6bd4ab80bfca37@cat-v.org>
In-Reply-To: <6104d1669942e762ba6bd4ab80bfca37@cat-v.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2ec987e2-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

uriel@cat-v.org wrote:
> I would rather ask:
>
> 	"What is wrong with C?"
>
>  and then
>
> 	"What is wrong with C that Limbo didn't fix?"
>
>

I don't think the question makes sense.  If you mean why do any other
language than C, then you have to ask, to do what?  Not the beginning
of a discourse, but I just wanted to point out the what's wrong with
the question.