From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
References: <ce7293a0-a7c8-460c-9944-7d7b693ea40a@googlegroups.com>
	<e67812e1-e914-4f62-bb98-ba70f8a40435@googlegroups.com>
	<CAFSF3XNRSUhB90nxNrbehi7gwqxCte+GmRAv=QV4UZ5wQNYJMA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFSF3XNRSUhB90nxNrbehi7gwqxCte+GmRAv=QV4UZ5wQNYJMA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Message-Id: <4439CBC1-9990-46C1-A7AB-923461A75214@bitblocks.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 09:41:21 -0700
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] 9atom vs 9front
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2996e740-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Mar 14, 2013, at 6:05 AM, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote:

> the difference about 9front is that it also works on real hardware, so
> you don't need to mess with these VMs.

A VM is far more convenient and portable for me.