9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Lalonde <plalonde@telus.net>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] nvidia scrolling performance
Date: Fri,  5 May 2006 10:30:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44473542-A63E-44DA-B74F-F93AA457AA8C@telus.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <445B8634.7050306@lanl.gov>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I'm going to claim there is a difference.  The GPU handles all the  
threading issues needed to deal with the parallelism the GPU offers,  
at the cost of a restricted programming model (some random-access  
reads, no random access writes); the SPU offers a more general  
computing model, but you have to handle all the memory movement and  
syncrhonization issues.
You can choose to use the SPU as a GPU with many more registers and  
some extra random-access storage, but more general models can be  
applied, and useful.

Paul

On 5-May-06, at 10:07 AM, Ronald G Minnich wrote:

> Paul Lalonde wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> Aw, but I'd claim all that fancy 3-D graphics stuff is real   
>> computation :-)
>> But yeah, GPU abuse for general purpose computation is just plain   
>> scary.  I thank my lucky stars that there is plenty of FLOPS to  
>> go  around in the Cell's SPUs.
>
> uh, there's no real difference between GPU computation and SPU  
> computation, saving there's more of them SPUs. All the problems apply.
>
> ron

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFEW4unpJeHo/Fbu1wRAlkCAKC9dTCVlcN2jULQKEU5dMyK4L9gJwCeKvdN
2YjgFjnKlb9MCAeZ9bqzFLg=
=f0JX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-05 17:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-05 15:46 erik quanstrom
2006-05-05 15:56 ` Paul Lalonde
2006-05-05 16:01   ` David Leimbach
2006-05-05 16:21     ` Paul Lalonde
2006-05-05 16:59       ` David Leimbach
2006-05-05 16:05   ` Wes
2006-05-05 17:07   ` Ronald G Minnich
2006-05-05 17:30     ` Paul Lalonde [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-05-05 18:08 erik quanstrom
2006-05-05 17:22 erik quanstrom
2006-05-05 17:32 ` Paul Lalonde
2006-05-05 16:08 erik quanstrom
2006-05-05 16:42 ` David Leimbach
2006-05-01  0:52 erik quanstrom
2006-05-01  1:00 ` Paul Lalonde
2006-05-01  0:30 erik quanstrom
2006-05-01 17:44 ` Russ Cox
2006-05-01 17:57   ` Artem Letko
2006-05-01 19:02     ` Russ Cox
2006-04-29 21:39 erik quanstrom
2006-04-30  4:00 ` jmk
2006-04-30 16:10 ` Russ Cox
2006-04-30 18:12   ` Steve Simon
2006-04-30 22:34     ` Ronald G Minnich
2006-05-01  6:52       ` Nigel Roles
2006-05-01 19:58         ` Ronald G Minnich
2006-05-01 20:10           ` David Leimbach

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44473542-A63E-44DA-B74F-F93AA457AA8C@telus.net \
    --to=plalonde@telus.net \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).