9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Presotto <presotto@closedmind.org>
To: enache@rdslink.ro, 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] plan9's C compiler and // comments
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 23:06:23 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4474ff21207aa9cf44a6e3f715f6b492@plan9.bell-labs.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 402 bytes --]

Looks like just the opposite to me.  /**/ comments are handled specially.
The prepocessor doesn't know anything about // comments.  If you want to
change it, I wouldn't mind.  I think nobody ever thought of or cared to
do it before because we frown so much on programming with the preprocessor.

The // at the end of your endif makes it through only because everything after the
endif is ignored.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2629 bytes --]

From: Enache Adrian <enache@rdslink.ro>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] plan9's C compiler and // comments
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 05:21:21 +0300
Message-ID: <20030915022121.GC1290@ratsnest.hole>

> On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 a.d., David Presotto wrote:
> > It accepts it just fine.  You're just defining a macro as
> >
> > 	"wow!"	// this won't work
> >
> > and when it gets expanded in the exits you get
> >
> > void main() { exits("wow!"	// this won't work); }

Judging about what I understand of cmd/cc/macbody:237-260,
ex. the /**/ comments are not passed through macros to be dealt with
later, but discarded during the parsing of the '#define' directive.

So the handling of '//' comments is just special in this case.

Regards,
Adi

             reply	other threads:[~2003-09-15  3:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-15  3:06 David Presotto [this message]
2003-09-15  3:14 ` mirtchov
2003-09-15  3:19   ` David Presotto
2003-09-15  7:11     ` Charles Forsyth
2003-09-15  7:51   ` boyd, rounin
2003-09-15  8:23   ` boyd, rounin
2003-09-15  3:21 ` Bruce Ellis
2003-09-15  8:00   ` boyd, rounin
2003-09-15  4:06 ` Enache Adrian
2003-09-15  7:03   ` Charles Forsyth
2003-09-15  7:49 ` boyd, rounin
2003-09-15  8:01   ` Geoff Collyer
     [not found] <1630899296@snellwilcox.com>
2003-09-15 11:01 ` steve.simon
2003-09-15 11:23   ` C H Forsyth
2003-09-15 11:26   ` C H Forsyth
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-15  1:02 David Presotto
2003-09-15  1:16 ` Enache Adrian
2003-09-15  1:23   ` boyd, rounin
2003-09-15  7:21     ` Charles Forsyth
2003-09-15  2:21   ` Enache Adrian
2003-09-15  0:49 Enache Adrian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4474ff21207aa9cf44a6e3f715f6b492@plan9.bell-labs.com \
    --to=presotto@closedmind.org \
    --cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
    --cc=enache@rdslink.ro \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).