From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <447BCB5E.8040206@lanl.gov> Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 22:34:38 -0600 From: Ronald G Minnich User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] 3 questions References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Topicbox-Message-UUID: 581cc5a0-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 lucio@proxima.alt.za wrote: > Well, what's so bad about editing raw HTML? It is considerably more > embarrassing to publish the type of unreadable trash (only its mother > could love that HTML!) produced by the average HTML editor. Take a > look, sometimes. It's not me. It's a user. This is a very common problem. I just edit html myself. But I was wondering if there was something more acceptable under plan 9 than raw html. thanks ron