From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <44873A42.7010600@lanl.gov> Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 14:42:42 -0600 From: Ronald G Minnich User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] gcc on plan9 References: <200606071058.35174.corey_s@qwest.net> <20060607182441.GF28313@submarine> <44871FF4.2090301@lanl.gov> <20060607185532.GA27660@mero.morphisms.net> <4487332B.7060407@lanl.gov> <20060607202027.GD29458@submarine> In-Reply-To: <20060607202027.GD29458@submarine> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5cad9f7c-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 Roman Shaposhnick wrote: > I truly share your sentiment because that's exactly what I hear from > my customers as well. Now, what's interesting is -- are you talking about > Fortran scientific apps or something else ? Because if fortran is anywhere > to be found than surely these guys must use something else rather than > gcc at least occasionally. After all, up until 2004 fortran support in > gcc used to be a total joke. It's just that I can't think of a single scientific app that runs on Plan 9. Oh, maybe that one Andrey ported. But stuff like nwchem, mpqc, NAS PB, the HPCS benchmarks, ... it's a long list. > Could you give examples of such apps, or are they internal ?\ some internal. Actually, just go find about any C++ app, or get the R framework, and see all the stuff it does ... eek. ron