From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <448B4FB6.1020909@lanl.gov>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 17:03:18 -0600
From: Ronald G Minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] quantity vs. quality
References: <336d6f267e535644d46723b2ea4dc67c@quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <336d6f267e535644d46723b2ea4dc67c@quanstro.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 676e2846-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

quanstro@quanstro.net wrote:

> i have never seen malloc failure on a production system where
> recovery was possible; i have seen some memory corruption that
> led to malloc failure, but there's no recovering from that.

we've seen different things, then.

ron