From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <448B7E06.9030704@lanl.gov>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 20:20:54 -0600
From: Ronald G Minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] quantity vs. quality
References: <d79dbb05ed199444b12761dbff46dd7b@quanstro.net>
In-Reply-To: <d79dbb05ed199444b12761dbff46dd7b@quanstro.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 67b8162c-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

quanstro@quanstro.net wrote:
> i think we mostly agree.  i'm a little sick of trying to read code with
> gobs of recovery goo that may or may not ever get executed.
> who knows?
> 


Maybe we just need waserror() in user mode.

Then, you want to recover, you at least get the chance.

Or is waserror() there in the library and I never noticed?

ron