From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <4492CC16.6020308@lanl.gov>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 09:19:50 -0600
From: Ronald G Minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: Inferno on OLPC? (was Re: [9fans] *poof*)
References: <7a33156a1f7ff4688152051f59aecefc@quanstro.net>	<2b977395580f363d7a1fadde4dc3c26f@vitanuova.com>
	<a4e6962a0606160630p6a7d1cf6h3ad971a07829a9f4@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <a4e6962a0606160630p6a7d1cf6h3ad971a07829a9f4@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6bcf0c5c-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
> On 6/16/06, rog@vitanuova.com <rog@vitanuova.com> wrote:
> 
>> > The other issue is that, evidently, you can't build inferno under 
>> inferno.
>>
>> are there sufficient resources on the OLPC to build (say) Linux inside 
>> Linux?
>>
> 
> The right question is, at 10-15W per child, how long will it take a
> child with a crank to power a full Linux build....
> 
> Of course, no local disk may also be a factor there....
> 
>          -eric

actually, the crank is history.

ron