[9fans] release -1 of smacme

[9fans] release -1 of smacme

[Ronald G Minnich]

OK, people actually want this damned thing.

So, in the interests of furthering the secret plans of the SP9SSS, I
have put the source to smacme in contrib/rminnich.

It's called smacme because I expect to have to say: 'don't smacme!' when
I tell people about it. Plus, emacs had one more letter than acme, and
used 5 letters, so now we have evened up the score. 6 letters, 5
different letters.

What it is: well, just build and start it up, then type stuff like ^D
and ^P and ^N and ^K. What are all the commands? That's secret.

You don't like it, don't use it. You like it, well, then add more stuff
to it as you see fit, and let me know.

Bugs? But of course.

ron

Re: [9fans] release -1 of smacme

[Federico Benavento]

Hola,

this is a DP9IK's contribution to smacme:
if you do ^P at the last line it crashes, here's the fix

lotte% diff text.orig text.c
811c811,812
< 			}			if (textreadc(t, q0) == '\n'){
---
> 			}
> 			if (q0>=t->q1 || textreadc(t, q0) == '\n'){



On 7/6/06, Ronald G Minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov> wrote:
> OK, people actually want this damned thing.
>
> So, in the interests of furthering the secret plans of the SP9SSS, I
> have put the source to smacme in contrib/rminnich.
>
> It's called smacme because I expect to have to say: 'don't smacme!' when
> I tell people about it. Plus, emacs had one more letter than acme, and
> used 5 letters, so now we have evened up the score. 6 letters, 5
> different letters.
>
> What it is: well, just build and start it up, then type stuff like ^D
> and ^P and ^N and ^K. What are all the commands? That's secret.
>
> You don't like it, don't use it. You like it, well, then add more stuff
> to it as you see fit, and let me know.
>
> Bugs? But of course.
>
> ron
>


--
Federico G. Benavento

Re: [9fans] release -1 of smacme

[David Leimbach]

On 7/6/06, Ronald G Minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov> wrote:
> OK, people actually want this damned thing.
>
> So, in the interests of furthering the secret plans of the SP9SSS, I
> have put the source to smacme in contrib/rminnich.
>
> It's called smacme because I expect to have to say: 'don't smacme!' when
> I tell people about it. Plus, emacs had one more letter than acme, and
> used 5 letters, so now we have evened up the score. 6 letters, 5
> different letters.
>
> What it is: well, just build and start it up, then type stuff like ^D
> and ^P and ^N and ^K. What are all the commands? That's secret.
>
> You don't like it, don't use it. You like it, well, then add more stuff
> to it as you see fit, and let me know.
>
> Bugs? But of course.
>
> ron
>

Neat... tempted to make ^K stuff into /dev/snarf... and have ^Y read
from /dev/snarf

Re: Re: [9fans] release -1 of smacme

[Rob Pike]

You've lost your way.

-rob


On 7/6/06, David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/6/06, Ronald G Minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov> wrote:
> > OK, people actually want this damned thing.
> >
> > So, in the interests of furthering the secret plans of the SP9SSS, I
> > have put the source to smacme in contrib/rminnich.
> >
> > It's called smacme because I expect to have to say: 'don't smacme!' when
> > I tell people about it. Plus, emacs had one more letter than acme, and
> > used 5 letters, so now we have evened up the score. 6 letters, 5
> > different letters.
> >
> > What it is: well, just build and start it up, then type stuff like ^D
> > and ^P and ^N and ^K. What are all the commands? That's secret.
> >
> > You don't like it, don't use it. You like it, well, then add more stuff
> > to it as you see fit, and let me know.
> >
> > Bugs? But of course.
> >
> > ron
> >
>
> Neat... tempted to make ^K stuff into /dev/snarf... and have ^Y read
> from /dev/snarf
>

Re: Re: Re: [9fans] release -1 of smacme

[David Leimbach]

LOL, totally knew he'd show up if I said that :-)

Hi Rob, don't worry I was kidding.

Dave

On 7/6/06, Rob Pike <robpike@gmail.com> wrote:
> You've lost your way.
>
> -rob
>
>
> On 7/6/06, David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 7/6/06, Ronald G Minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov> wrote:
> > > OK, people actually want this damned thing.
> > >
> > > So, in the interests of furthering the secret plans of the SP9SSS, I
> > > have put the source to smacme in contrib/rminnich.
> > >
> > > It's called smacme because I expect to have to say: 'don't smacme!' when
> > > I tell people about it. Plus, emacs had one more letter than acme, and
> > > used 5 letters, so now we have evened up the score. 6 letters, 5
> > > different letters.
> > >
> > > What it is: well, just build and start it up, then type stuff like ^D
> > > and ^P and ^N and ^K. What are all the commands? That's secret.
> > >
> > > You don't like it, don't use it. You like it, well, then add more stuff
> > > to it as you see fit, and let me know.
> > >
> > > Bugs? But of course.
> > >
> > > ron
> > >
> >
> > Neat... tempted to make ^K stuff into /dev/snarf... and have ^Y read
> > from /dev/snarf
> >
>

Re: [9fans] release -1 of smacme

[Ronald G Minnich]

David Leimbach wrote:
> LOL, totally knew he'd show up if I said that :-)
>
> Hi Rob, don't worry I was kidding.
>

yeah, but, like it or not folks, people want it, so I went ahead and did
it.

It's not called smacme for nothing.

ron

Re: Re: [9fans] release -1 of smacme

[David Leimbach]

On 7/7/06, Ronald G Minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov> wrote:
> David Leimbach wrote:
> > LOL, totally knew he'd show up if I said that :-)
> >
> > Hi Rob, don't worry I was kidding.
> >
>
> yeah, but, like it or not folks, people want it, so I went ahead and did
> it.
>
> It's not called smacme for nothing.
>
> ron
>

I was only kidding about the snarf buffer stuff... :-)  I have often
needed to navigate up or down one line at a time and didn't want to
grab the mouse to do so.

It's a text editor, I'm going to type "eventually", why move my hand
really far away from the place where I do that to move up or down one
line?

The same argument holds for why pointing and clicking the mouse 30
lines down is faster than hitting down 30 times so I don't see that as
a violation of the spirit of what Acme is supposed to be very good at.

The original author may disagree with me.

The snarf comment was just an attempt to get "smacked" ;-).  The fact
that I have mouse chording alone means that this feature would have
been duplicate and probably not as good as what's already there.

Dave

Re: [9fans] release -1 of smacme

[Ronald G Minnich]

David Leimbach wrote:
> The snarf comment was just an attempt to get "smacked" ;-).  The fact
> that I have mouse chording alone means that this feature would have
> been duplicate and probably not as good as what's already there.

well, you win, because I was supposed to be first. No fair.

thanks

ron

Re: Re: [9fans] release -1 of smacme

[John Floren]

On 7/7/06, David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/7/06, Ronald G Minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov> wrote:
> > David Leimbach wrote:
> > > LOL, totally knew he'd show up if I said that :-)
> > >
> > > Hi Rob, don't worry I was kidding.
> > >
> >
> > yeah, but, like it or not folks, people want it, so I went ahead and did
> > it.
> >
> > It's not called smacme for nothing.
> >
> > ron
> >
>
> I was only kidding about the snarf buffer stuff... :-)  I have often
> needed to navigate up or down one line at a time and didn't want to
> grab the mouse to do so.
>
> It's a text editor, I'm going to type "eventually", why move my hand
> really far away from the place where I do that to move up or down one
> line?
I agree. This is an annoyance for me. I also wish rc would get *some*
kind of history; if I want to re-run troff after making a change to a
file, it's faster to type "!!" than to select the previous command,
snarfing, pasting, clicking at the end of the line, and hitting enter.

> The same argument holds for why pointing and clicking the mouse 30
> lines down is faster than hitting down 30 times so I don't see that as
> a violation of the spirit of what Acme is supposed to be very good at.
>
> The original author may disagree with me.
>
> The snarf comment was just an attempt to get "smacked" ;-).  The fact
> that I have mouse chording alone means that this feature would have
> been duplicate and probably not as good as what's already there.
I wouldn't mind a shortcut to paste. When snarfing, the hand is
already on the mouse anyway, but if I want to paste multiple times
over time, I'd like to do it with hands on the keyboard.

> Dave
>


--
TANSTAAFL! (There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch!)

Re: Re: Re: [9fans] release -1 of smacme

[David Leimbach]

> > The same argument holds for why pointing and clicking the mouse 30
> > lines down is faster than hitting down 30 times so I don't see that as
> > a violation of the spirit of what Acme is supposed to be very good at.
> >
> > The original author may disagree with me.
> >
> > The snarf comment was just an attempt to get "smacked" ;-).  The fact
> > that I have mouse chording alone means that this feature would have
> > been duplicate and probably not as good as what's already there.
> I wouldn't mind a shortcut to paste. When snarfing, the hand is
> already on the mouse anyway, but if I want to paste multiple times
> over time, I'd like to do it with hands on the keyboard.

This is one of those times where a personal preference may make you
really want to make this change.  Ron's code is out there :-).

Honestly, I find chording fits in better with my workflow.  In fact,
I've often wondered why the chording keyboard never made it.  Douglas
Englebart seemed to like it.

Seems like the sort of thing geeks would drool over if they could master it :-)

I mean, my mother who was a typist used foot pedals for dictation
machines, why'd she have all the cool shortcuts?

I should talk to my EE buddies and see if we can make such a thing
someday, unless people know of a good chording keyboard that already
exists.

>
> > Dave
> >
>
>
> --
> TANSTAAFL! (There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch!)
>

Re: Re: Re: [9fans] release -1 of smacme

[Jack Johnson]

On 7/7/06, David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com> wrote:
> Honestly, I find chording fits in better with my workflow.

I can never seem to chord on these damn Macs, no matter how many fingers I use.

Speaking of which, anyone find a chord-worthy laptop lately?  I always
keep my eyes peeled, and I think I saw three buttons on the new VAIOs.

-Jack

Re: Re: Re: [9fans] release -1 of smacme

[C H Forsyth]

>I can never seem to chord on these damn Macs, no matter how many fingers I use.

i replace the pretty mouse on mine by one that's more useful.

Re: Re: Re: Re: [9fans] release -1 of smacme

[David Leimbach]

On 7/7/06, Jack Johnson <knapjack@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/7/06, David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Honestly, I find chording fits in better with my workflow.
>
> I can never seem to chord on these damn Macs, no matter how many fingers I use.

Get a new mouse, they work fine... In fact I got this great trackball:

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00009KH63/sr=8-1/qid=1152289146/ref=pd_bbs_1/104-2732001-4099155?ie=UTF8

>
> Speaking of which, anyone find a chord-worthy laptop lately?  I always
> keep my eyes peeled, and I think I saw three buttons on the new VAIOs.

Oh a laptop... ugh :-)

May as well get one of those cheap 3 button IBM USB mice.  Should also
work fine :-)

>
> -Jack
>

Re: Re: [9fans] release -1 of smacme

[C H Forsyth]

fn !! {
	whatever you like
}

although i tend to use x (say) rather than !!
normally i used send, but the above is easier when moving between
several windows and acme for one task

Re: Re: [9fans] release -1 of smacme

[uriel]

> fn !! {
> 	whatever you like
> }
>
> although i tend to use x (say) rather than !!
> normally i used send, but the above is easier when moving between
> several windows and acme for one task

Various ways of doing this have been posted to 9fans back when the
list actually had some useful traffic.  My favorites are russ' " and
"" that can be found in /n/sources/contrib/rsc/scripts/ Many other
useful bits can be found in russ's contrib dir, I find g and Clean
particularly handy.

And for those that need a way to go to the previous or next line with
the keyboard, ^A+Left and ^E+Right do just that.

uriel

Re: Re: [9fans] release -1 of smacme

[jmk]

On Fri Jul  7 12:28:09 EDT 2006, uriel@cat-v.org wrote:
> ...
> Various ways of doing this have been posted to 9fans back when the
> list actually had some useful traffic.  My favorites are russ' " and
> ...

OK, I'll bite for the 2nd time today - where's the useful traffic?

Re: Re: [9fans] release -1 of smacme

[Brantley Coile]

> OK, I'll bite for the 2nd time today - where's the useful traffic?

It's a lot better than what's on TV.

Re: Re: Re: [9fans] release -1 of smacme

[David Leimbach]

On 7/7/06, Brantley Coile <brantley@coraid.com> wrote:
> > OK, I'll bite for the 2nd time today - where's the useful traffic?
>
> It's a lot better than what's on TV.
>
>

Except that, like TV, I often have to ignore the annoying bits to get
the parts I want.

People have different levels of tolerance for the signal to noise
ratio that is often upredictable on any given mailing list.

Re: [9fans] release -1 of smacme

[Ronald G Minnich]

jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote:
> On Fri Jul  7 12:28:09 EDT 2006, uriel@cat-v.org wrote:
>
>>...
>>Various ways of doing this have been posted to 9fans back when the
>>list actually had some useful traffic.  My favorites are russ' " and
>>...
>
>
> OK, I'll bite for the 2nd time today - where's the useful traffic?

Well, I never knew about the utili-kilt until you mentioned it, and lack
of pink color for same.

So, you learn something new every day.

ron

Re: [9fans] release -1 of smacme

[Ronald G Minnich]

uriel@cat-v.org wrote:

> And for those that need a way to go to the previous or next line with
> the keyboard, ^A+Left and ^E+Right do just that.

yeah, I oughtta mention w.r.t. this ... I didn't really add lots of
stuff for smacme. Once I realized (RTSL) that ^A and ^E and Left and
Right and ^U and ^W were there, the objections to adding a few more
things kind of melted away for me ... particularly ^D.

ron

Re: [9fans] release -1 of smacme

[Ronald G Minnich]

David Leimbach wrote:

> Neat... tempted to make ^K stuff into /dev/snarf... and have ^Y read
> from /dev/snarf


go for it.

ron

Re: [9fans] release -1 of smacme

[Christoph Lohmann]

Good morning.

Am Thu, 06 Jul 2006 16:18:40 -0600 schrieb Ronald G Minnich
<rminnich@lanl.gov>:

> So, in the interests of furthering the secret plans of the SP9SSS, I
> have put the source to smacme in contrib/rminnich.

SP9SSS is getting a joke of itself.

Sincerely,

Christoph

Re: [9fans] release -1 of smacme

[Ronald G Minnich]

Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> Good morning.
>
> Am Thu, 06 Jul 2006 16:18:40 -0600 schrieb Ronald G Minnich
> <rminnich@lanl.gov>:
>
>
>>So, in the interests of furthering the secret plans of the SP9SSS, I
>>have put the source to smacme in contrib/rminnich.
>
>
> SP9SSS is getting a joke of itself.

uh, dude, that's the point.

I guess humor just does not translate, or you have no sense of humor of
which we are aware.

thanks

ron

Re: [9fans] release -1 of smacme

[Christoph Lohmann]

Good day.

Am Fri, 07 Jul 2006 08:09:47 -0600 schrieb Ronald G Minnich
<rminnich@lanl.gov>:

> uh, dude, that's the point.
>
> I guess humor just does not translate, or you have no sense of humor of
> which we are aware.

So you are a joke, right?

Sincerely,

Christoph

Re: [9fans] release -1 of smacme

[Ronald G Minnich]

Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> Good day.
>
> Am Fri, 07 Jul 2006 08:09:47 -0600 schrieb Ronald G Minnich
> <rminnich@lanl.gov>:
>
>
>>uh, dude, that's the point.
>>
>>I guess humor just does not translate, or you have no sense of humor of
>>which we are aware.
>
>
> So you are a joke, right?

if one makes a joke, is one a joke?

Or, if one has a (perhaps) terminal lack of a sense of humor, is one a
joke?

just wondering :-)

ron

Re: [9fans] release -1 of smacme

[uriel]

Sieg Heil!

> Christoph Lohmann wrote:
>> Good morning.
>> 
>> Am Thu, 06 Jul 2006 16:18:40 -0600 schrieb Ronald G Minnich
>> <rminnich@lanl.gov>:
>> 
>>>So, in the interests of furthering the secret plans of the SP9SSS, I 
>>>have put the source to smacme in contrib/rminnich.
>> 
>> SP9SSS is getting a joke of itself.
> 
> uh, dude, that's the point.
> 
> I guess humor just does not translate, or you have no sense of humor of 
> which we are aware.

The total lack of humorous (or otherwise) perception reigning in the SP9SSS
is the best joke of all.

Sincerely

uriel - Führer der Dissident Plan 9 IRC Kids


P.S.: Ph34r our S3cr3t World Domination Plan IX.

Re: [9fans] release -1 of smacme

[jmk]

Wenn ist das Nunstück git und Slotermeyer?  Ja! 
...Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!

If you survived that, to repeat, where is the interesting Plan 9
related traffic these days?

On Fri Jul  7 15:53:46 EDT 2006, uriel@cat-v.org wrote:
> Sieg Heil!
> 
> > Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> >> Good morning.
> >> 
> >> Am Thu, 06 Jul 2006 16:18:40 -0600 schrieb Ronald G Minnich
> >> <rminnich@lanl.gov>:
> >> 
> >>>So, in the interests of furthering the secret plans of the SP9SSS, I 
> >>>have put the source to smacme in contrib/rminnich.
> >> 
> >> SP9SSS is getting a joke of itself.
> > 
> > uh, dude, that's the point.
> > 
> > I guess humor just does not translate, or you have no sense of humor of 
> > which we are aware.
> 
> The total lack of humorous (or otherwise) perception reigning in the SP9SSS
> is the best joke of all.
> 
> Sincerely
> 
> uriel - Führer der Dissident Plan 9 IRC Kids
> 
> 
> P.S.: Ph34r our S3cr3t World Domination Plan IX.

Re: Re: [9fans] release -1 of smacme

[David Leimbach]

On 7/7/06, jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com <jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com> wrote:
> Wenn ist das Nunstück git und Slotermeyer?  Ja!
> ...Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
>
> If you survived that, to repeat, where is the interesting Plan 9
> related traffic these days?
>

On the v9fs mailing list.

*runs away*

> On Fri Jul  7 15:53:46 EDT 2006, uriel@cat-v.org wrote:
> > Sieg Heil!
> >
> > > Christoph Lohmann wrote:
> > >> Good morning.
> > >>
> > >> Am Thu, 06 Jul 2006 16:18:40 -0600 schrieb Ronald G Minnich
> > >> <rminnich@lanl.gov>:
> > >>
> > >>>So, in the interests of furthering the secret plans of the SP9SSS, I
> > >>>have put the source to smacme in contrib/rminnich.
> > >>
> > >> SP9SSS is getting a joke of itself.
> > >
> > > uh, dude, that's the point.
> > >
> > > I guess humor just does not translate, or you have no sense of humor of
> > > which we are aware.
> >
> > The total lack of humorous (or otherwise) perception reigning in the SP9SSS
> > is the best joke of all.
> >
> > Sincerely
> >
> > uriel - Führer der Dissident Plan 9 IRC Kids
> >
> >
> > P.S.: Ph34r our S3cr3t World Domination Plan IX.
>

Re: [9fans] release -1 of smacme

[uriel]

Sieg Heil!

> Wenn ist das Nunstück git und Slotermeyer?  Ja! 
> ...Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
> 
> If you survived that, to repeat, where is the interesting Plan 9
> related traffic these days?

Who said that there is any interesting Plan 9 related traffic thise
days?

Of course the sup3r s3cr3t DP9IK list[1] is the only exception.  But
for security and religious reasons to join first one has to provide a
brain tissue sample, sacrifice by impalement nine google developers to
Goddess Glenda, chop off your left little finger and bomb at least one
Apple Store.

Insincerely

uriel - Führer der Dissident Plan 9 IRC Kids

[1] Also known as #acme

> 
> On Fri Jul  7 15:53:46 EDT 2006, uriel@cat-v.org wrote:
>> Sieg Heil!
>> 
>> > Christoph Lohmann wrote:
>> >> Good morning.
>> >> 
>> >> Am Thu, 06 Jul 2006 16:18:40 -0600 schrieb Ronald G Minnich
>> >> <rminnich@lanl.gov>:
>> >> 
>> >>>So, in the interests of furthering the secret plans of the SP9SSS, I 
>> >>>have put the source to smacme in contrib/rminnich.
>> >> 
>> >> SP9SSS is getting a joke of itself.
>> > 
>> > uh, dude, that's the point.
>> > 
>> > I guess humor just does not translate, or you have no sense of humor of 
>> > which we are aware.
>> 
>> The total lack of humorous (or otherwise) perception reigning in the SP9SSS
>> is the best joke of all.
>> 
>> Sincerely
>> 
>> uriel - Führer der Dissident Plan 9 IRC Kids
>> 
>> 
>> P.S.: Ph34r our S3cr3t World Domination Plan IX.

Re: [9fans] release -1 of smacme

[jmk]

On Fri Jul  7 22:39:27 EDT 2006, uriel@cat-v.org wrote:
> Sieg Heil!
> 
> > Wenn ist das Nunstück git und Slotermeyer?  Ja! 
> > ...Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
> > 
> > If you survived that, to repeat, where is the interesting Plan 9
> > related traffic these days?
> 
> Who said that there is any interesting Plan 9 related traffic thise
> days?
> ...

Well, I asked a question in response you your comment earlier today:

	Various ways of doing this have been posted to 9fans back when the
	list actually had some useful traffic.

I asked it 3 times and you responded with the above question.
I guess you're not a native German speaker.

Re: [9fans] release -1 of smacme

[quanstro]

off topic.

das is ja kein deutsch, auch wenn manche wörter kaplizert werden.

☺ erik

On Fri Jul  7 22:46:15 CDT 2006, jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote:
> On Fri Jul  7 22:39:27 EDT 2006, uriel@cat-v.org wrote:
> > Sieg Heil!
> > 
> > > Wenn ist das Nunstück git und Slotermeyer?  Ja! 
> > > ...Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
> > > 
> > > If you survived that, to repeat, where is the interesting Plan 9
> > > related traffic these days?
> > 
> > Who said that there is any interesting Plan 9 related traffic thise
> > days?
> > ...
> 
> Well, I asked a question in response you your comment earlier today:
> 
> 	Various ways of doing this have been posted to 9fans back when the
> 	list actually had some useful traffic.
> 
> I asked it 3 times and you responded with the above question.
> I guess you're not a native German speaker.

Re: [9fans] release -1 of smacme

[jmk]

Hmm. Maybe the joke has to be spoken, not just read?

On Fri Jul  7 23:51:14 EDT 2006, quanstro@quanstro.net wrote:
> off topic.
> 
> das is ja kein deutsch, auch wenn manche wörter kaplizert werden.
> 
> ☺ erik
> 
> On Fri Jul  7 22:46:15 CDT 2006, jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote:
> > On Fri Jul  7 22:39:27 EDT 2006, uriel@cat-v.org wrote:
> > > Sieg Heil!
> > > 
> > > > Wenn ist das Nunstück git und Slotermeyer?  Ja! 
> > > > ...Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
> > > > 
> > > > If you survived that, to repeat, where is the interesting Plan 9
> > > > related traffic these days?
> > > 
> > > Who said that there is any interesting Plan 9 related traffic thise
> > > days?
> > > ...
> > 
> > Well, I asked a question in response you your comment earlier today:
> > 
> > 	Various ways of doing this have been posted to 9fans back when the
> > 	list actually had some useful traffic.
> > 
> > I asked it 3 times and you responded with the above question.
> > I guess you're not a native German speaker.

Re: [9fans] release -1 of smacme

[quanstro]

oh!  i finally stopped doing that.  my wife looks at me funny when i 
read my email aloud. ;-)

- erik

On Fri Jul  7 23:26:48 CDT 2006, jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote:
> Hmm. Maybe the joke has to be spoken, not just read?
> 
> On Fri Jul  7 23:51:14 EDT 2006, quanstro@quanstro.net wrote:
> > off topic.
> > 
> > das is ja kein deutsch, auch wenn manche wörter kaplizert werden.
> > 
> > ☺ erik
> > 
> > On Fri Jul  7 22:46:15 CDT 2006, jmk@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote:
> > > On Fri Jul  7 22:39:27 EDT 2006, uriel@cat-v.org wrote:
> > > > Sieg Heil!
> > > > 
> > > > > Wenn ist das Nunstück git und Slotermeyer?  Ja! 
> > > > > ...Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
> > > > > 
> > > > > If you survived that, to repeat, where is the interesting Plan 9
> > > > > related traffic these days?
> > > > 
> > > > Who said that there is any interesting Plan 9 related traffic thise
> > > > days?
> > > > ...
> > > 
> > > Well, I asked a question in response you your comment earlier today:
> > > 
> > > 	Various ways of doing this have been posted to 9fans back when the
> > > 	list actually had some useful traffic.
> > > 
> > > I asked it 3 times and you responded with the above question.
> > > I guess you're not a native German speaker.