From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-Id: <44F2A3F2-4D43-47A5-B369-1549459FEB28@orthanc.ca>
From: Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <F679E78A-CEF3-43FC-8930-EB852C97A5AB@mac.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v912)
Subject: Re: [9fans] Intel Pro/1000 PT support?
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:33:59 -0800
References: <0B17DBB9-DAD6-49B7-B565-FA7F6763DE78@orthanc.ca>
	<F679E78A-CEF3-43FC-8930-EB852C97A5AB@mac.com>
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f64e49aa-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025


On 2007-Nov-12, at 17:25 , Pietro Gagliardi wrote:

> I thought PRO/1000 worked already (see the Wiki)

There are a few different Pro/1000 variants.  I'm specifically  
interested in the Pro/1000-PT quad-port card.  It's based on the 82571  
(according to Intel's online spec's), which is supported by the  
driver.  I'm just concerned about any quirks or potential gotchas in  
relation to this specific card (e.g. PCI bus glue, phy interface, or  
what have you).