From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:06:32 -0400 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: <44a20375d50e77dfb05d75c5ab989474@brasstown.quanstro.net> In-Reply-To: References: <16d20c29be00a62eacb3dba96a700922@brasstown.quanstro.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] what am i missing Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7eed01b2-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Wed Apr 25 16:04:06 EDT 2012, rsc@swtch.com wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 3:46 PM, erik quanstrom wrote: > > i think that if you're asynchronously procexecing() and > > waiting for wait messages, some could have been lost. > > why would they be delivered to the proc running procexec? good point. procrfork() does nowait. but then how do i get a wait message. i'm really hoping the answer is not "you don't". - erik