From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@coraid.com>
Date: Wed,  4 Mar 2009 13:15:36 -0500
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Message-ID: <44a97592d45ce7ec13a8c8021da542a1@coraid.com>
In-Reply-To: <13426df10903040914q5b80031ene90d95d9dd53a19a@mail.gmail.com>
References: <3aaafc130903032105i742648d2o86ccd2630c4aa61c@mail.gmail.com>
	<21b55d1c3bb01fa55e90f9400a0cdfb1@quanstro.net>
	<3aaafc130903040852h691b8742t2052e61334c825eb@mail.gmail.com>
	<13426df10903040914q5b80031ene90d95d9dd53a19a@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] threads vs forks
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b19e7a58-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> That said, I sure would like to have a fusion IO card for venti. From
> what my friend is telling me the fusion card would be ideal for venti
> -- as long as we keep only the arenas  on it.

even better for ken's fs.  i would imagine the performance difference
between the fusion i/o card and mass storage is similar to that between
wrens and the jukebox.

- erik