From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <45219fb00606080232j6e503c82w@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 11:32:29 +0200 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Llu=EDs_Batlle?=" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] quantity vs. quality In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Topicbox-Message-UUID: 60c66dfa-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 Maybe something capable of running an isolated linux box in plan9's environment would do the trick, as some people do right now in Linux in order to run plan9. Let's say... a 'xen-like-thing' running on plan9, for running other kernels over the same hardware. Of course, I don't plan coding that. 2006/6/8, cej@gli.cas.cz : > > No, we need fresh ideas. An infinite number of monkeys turning Plan > > 9 into Linux is not progress. > > I agree 100%. Although I would LOVE to have some loonix prgs w/o > rebooting to L. Or c++, java, perl, etc... > Attract more people to the clean design (and they will, hopefully, > rewrite everything that is(isn't;-) worth it... > IMHO. > > ++pac. > >