From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <45219fb00705280536q19770c41i7a42a30c6572b81c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 14:36:27 +0200 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Llu=EDs_Batlle?=" To: "Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs" <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] (no subject) In-Reply-To: <73301f1ca8938ccd90e1874eb226f481@terzarima.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <73301f1ca8938ccd90e1874eb226f481@terzarima.net> Topicbox-Message-UUID: 73c55f50-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 Do you have code published for your implementation regarding ogdl? (In my implementation I support a subset of ogdl, I barely have grammar checking, and I'm happy with it :) Thanks, Llu=EDs. 2007/5/26, Charles Forsyth : > >some sort of agreement over the structure [for json] and wide support fo= r it > > there isn't though: i had to adjust the code to account for what > they apparently meant as opposed to what was documented, given examples > that people produce. > it was similar but a bit worse for ogdl. >