From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <45260AEF.8050901@enerla.net> Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 09:51:11 +0200 From: bituman User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] OT: the simplest public key encryption code... References: <283f5df10610040849s13446537ke08df0d6f214e9a3@mail.gmail.com> <6b7cc3fc199d6e4bb43019c261987dd9@quintile.net> <283f5df10610041041l2db80dc2q1d492fc8e17397cf@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <283f5df10610041041l2db80dc2q1d492fc8e17397cf@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Topicbox-Message-UUID: c6d09af8-ead1-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 LiteStar numnums wrote: > Ahh. No, neither TEA nor XTEA fit that category. > I'll take the rest to a private message... > On 10/4/06, *Steve Simon* < steve@quintile.net=20 > > wrote: > > Thanks for the pointers guys but I believe TEA and blowfish are > not public key systems, perhaps my terminology is broken, I am afte= r > a twin key system, seperate and different encryption and decryption > keys. > > somthing like RSA or eliptic curves... > > -Steve > > > > > --=20 > If work and leisure are soon to be subordinated to this one utopian=20 > principle -- absolute busyness -- then utopia and melancholy will come=20 > to coincide: an age without conflict will dawn, perpetually busy --=20 > and without consciousness. > > -- G=FCnter Grass=20 Id be glad if you forwarded those messages to me : ) im also interested. Not a real project just curiosity. Thank you Sandor Nagy