From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4549906437a668a8f1064647e6b21c64@quanstro.net> To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu Subject: Re: [9fans] Got thread experience? From: erik quanstrom Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:51:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <47210127.8080107@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Topicbox-Message-UUID: d96c42c4-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > So, those with experience with threading implementations on weird > real-time or embedded operating systems: > > Have you ever ran into a thread implementation where two threads > could *not* directly access each other's .bss (or equiv)/heap? > > i.e. have you ever encountered a scenario where sibling threads > actually had completely separate sets of page tables? under plan 9, don't we call those processes? that doesn't sound like any imbedded environment i've worked in. it's getting mighty fancy to have one set of pagetables. ;-) - erik