From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <45DDEEAB.9050708@tecmav.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 20:27:39 +0100
From: Adriano Verardo <a.verardo@tecmav.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Question about v9fs on Gentoo
References: <45DDD6F6.8060609@tecmav.com>	<13426df10702220952h6ce1c6e1hd6169e182190e39@mail.gmail.com>	<45DDDD82.80208@tecmav.com>
	<a4e6962a0702221114r5801d57apafcabf412b42fe43@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <a4e6962a0702221114r5801d57apafcabf412b42fe43@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 128eb466-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:

> On 2/22/07, Adriano Verardo <a.verardo@tecmav.com> wrote:
> 
>> ron minnich wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, I was saying ...
>>
>> I tried both "9p" and "9P".
>>
>> I don't know whether or not there is a specialized mount utils,
>> as in FreeBSD.
>>
>> If not, IMHO, mount should recognize the available fs from /proc.
>> 9p is not listed in /proc/filesystem, also when statically linked in the
>> kernel. I think It should be.
>>
> 
> If there is no 9p, 9p2000, or 9P in /proc/filesystems, there is
> something wrong with the way you have built your kernel or kernel
> module.
I see.
When you compile it as a module and than insmod it, do you
> see anything funny in /var/log/messages or dmesg?


I tried all possible ways to configure 9p.

Loadable module: 9p is in the lsmod output.
In-Kernel: in /var/log/dmesg I see "Activated 9P2000 ..."

In any case:
- no reference in /proc/filesystem
- mount -t 9p 127.0.0.1 /mnt -o debug=0xf
     -> Unknown file system type '9p'

Adriano