From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Date: Thu,  8 Mar 2007 09:38:47 +0000
From: "Douglas A. Gwyn" <DAGwyn@null.net>
Message-ID: <45EF1464.F0F0D13F@null.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <87tzwwvr2t.fsf@wmipf.in-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: [9fans] plan9 function names
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 1b25eb12-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> is there a reason why underscores are avoided in most function and
> variable names on Plan 9? ...

As with any matter of programming style, it's what the people
chose to do because they thought it worked better for them.
SomePeoplePreferThisStyle to a_style_using_underscores.
Followup-To: 
Distribution: 
Organization: University of Bath Computing Services, UK
Keywords: 
Cc: 


-- 
Dennis Davis, BUCS, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK
D.H.Davis@bath.ac.uk