From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: erik quanstrom Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 13:28:45 -0400 To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-ID: <45ad47d8b69ae705ef7fa6d83702477f@ladd.quanstro.net> In-Reply-To: <<4fe555158822df97a22b2076cc02e52a@9netics.com>> References: <<4fe555158822df97a22b2076cc02e52a@9netics.com>> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] /sys/src/9/ip/ip.h Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7d664170-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 On Sun Oct 4 12:47:55 EDT 2009, 9nut@9netics.com wrote: > perhaps the elimination of all traces of IL is a little too thorough? > it seems easier to leave Logil, Logilmsg in place rather than require > an extra (periodic) merge. one can't get by simply with bind > before/after. +1. i haven't done this because there's no assurance such a patch would be accepted so it would just result in a bigger delta, but if netlog used an interface like flag_install (from the fs kernel), it would be a step to seperating the protocols riding on ip. the protocols are currently imho too intertwined. and arp is too bound up with ip. arp is useful even without an ip stack. - erik