From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <46062ECB.1080108@conducive.org> Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:11:55 +0800 From: W B Hacker User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.8.0.8) Gecko/20061030 SeaMonkey/1.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] Dum-Bass question References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Topicbox-Message-UUID: 30ad8bd4-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 lucio@proxima.alt.za wrote: >> Objective of the exercise (at this point) is to confirm that plan9.ini or >> functional equivalent, effects the published default of disabling the second >> core in a Core-D P4, and, if so, attempt to re-enable same and see what, if >> anything, breaks. > > try plan9.ini(8) specially for the above, the flag you're looking for > is "*nomp" (the "*" at the beginning stops it being passed to the user > environment/user shell; I disapprove of all these *no... flags, but > that was the wisdom then). > > ++L > Thanks, I had all that well in hand ahead of time. I just could not find the 'plan9.ini' involved, as it didn't readily show up directly in listings. Issuing the simple '9fat:' with colon was all it took. That must be documented somewhere - but I had missed it. Bill