From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <464ce81c93fbfa597e4db6c9fe8f923a@csplan9.rit.edu> To: 9fans@9fans.net Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:31:16 -0400 From: john@csplan9.rit.edu In-Reply-To: <5d375e920904181516h6cd8205bg570517f4a6d43a26@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] web server Topicbox-Message-UUID: e7c4ce20-ead4-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Rudolf Sykora wrote: >>> Writing the core of a blog engine in three lines of rc is hard to >>> beat, plus you get the benefit of being able to manipulate and manage >>> all your data using the tools any self respecting Unix user loves. >>> >>> uriel >> >> well, I haven't thought about it deeply yet, but what I guess could be >> a problem with your approach is that many features would have to be >> somehow implemented first so that it all be useable. I mean e.g. ajax >> style of page content refresh, session management, perhaps POST method >> too. > > Whatever AJAX and sessions are good web development practices is > questionable, but in any case werc does provides you with the tools to > implement such things if that is what you really want. > > Werc handles POST just fine, and actually maht just implemented > multiple file upload, which I never bothered to do because I never had > use for it and thought it would be too hard, apparently didn't take > him more than an afternoon to do it. > > uriel So, how hard is it to get werc running on real Plan 9? The readme was for Plan 9 Ports last time I checked. John