From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <46565d572c3e38df55754840a1e96357@proxima.alt.za>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] GCC/G++: some stress testing
Date: Sat,  1 Mar 2008 22:19:22 +0200
From: lucio@proxima.alt.za
In-Reply-To: <47C99D5F.2060905@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6b594380-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> If GNU was so reliable we wouldn't see the C compiler generate random
> opcodes for architectures we use at my work. And that's *with* the 4x
> toolchain.

I'm not sure if I read you correctly, but all I'm looking for is some
confidence that P9GCC is worth pursuing.  I can't use the supplied
regression tests because they rely on expect and in any event they
only prove that things work, not that there are needs out there that
P9GCC actually satisfies.

++L