From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <466238C4.1000600@conducive.org>
Date: Sat,  2 Jun 2007 23:43:00 -0400
From: W B Hacker <wbh@conducive.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070221 SeaMonkey/1.1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] my previous note on vf
References: <13426df10706022014k240d2a96h12dea0548fa6a093@mail.gmail.com>	<6c2141e39eabf0aa0def1fb037b5968a@plan9.bell-labs.com>
	<13426df10706022032ob5fa20v16f983a5a79c319d@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <13426df10706022032ob5fa20v16f983a5a79c319d@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 77b41bc4-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

ron minnich wrote:
*snip*

> So, what could be going on here? I'm still puzzled.
>
> Comment from the user: "I think nobody really uses Plan 9 as a mail
> relay and that's why we're the only ones who see this". is she wrong?
> These errors I hit seem so basic, it's hard to believe nobody else
> sees them *assuming other people use plan 9 as a mail relay*. But I am
> sure we are not alone. Our setup at mbgokhale.org is that all mail, in
> and out, is handled by Plan 9. We've seen problems that are
> surprising, to say the least.
>
> thanks
>
> ron
>

Details my longer post, but Plan9 is not being any *more* 'obtuse' than legions
of other MTA.

Just obtuse with different semantics.  Ones not seen as often.

;-)

Bill