From: Philippe Anel <xigh@free.fr>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] About 9P ...
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2007 22:32:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <467C31EB.1060302@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070622165754.D21140@mrwint.cisco.com>
Well even if it can work, I don't think 9P was designed to allow such
type of
operation. Indeed, 9P basis is the transaction : ie a Request followed
by a Reply.
So I think you should not pipeline the requests.
Can a 9P specialist can confirm this ? If so ... I now understand why
Fids are
(or must be) choosen by the client.
Phil;
> Well, I've not read the protocol details for a while.
> But from memory I thought it allowed this type of operation:
>
> send: open,fid,file
> send: read,fid,args
> send: read,fid,args
>
> (wait one rtt)
>
> recv: open success/fail
> recv: read result / read error due to unknown fid
> recv: read result / read error due to unknown fid
>
> DF
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-22 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-19 20:11 Philippe Anel
2007-06-20 0:37 ` Russ Cox
2007-06-20 2:06 ` Roman Shaposhnick
2007-06-20 11:29 ` Anthony Sorace
2007-06-22 0:32 ` Derek Fawcus
2007-06-22 6:58 ` Philippe Anel
2007-06-22 15:57 ` Derek Fawcus
2007-06-22 20:32 ` Philippe Anel [this message]
2007-06-22 21:10 ` David Leimbach
2007-06-22 21:35 ` Philippe Anel
2007-06-22 21:46 ` David Leimbach
2007-06-22 21:55 ` Philippe Anel
2007-06-22 22:25 ` Philippe Anel
2007-06-22 22:57 ` David Leimbach
2007-06-22 23:01 ` Anant Narayanan
2007-06-23 4:30 ` Russ Cox
2007-06-23 5:10 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2007-06-23 9:25 ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2007-06-23 15:50 ` Martin Atkins
2007-06-23 6:24 ` Philippe Anel
2007-06-23 15:00 ` Rob Pike
2007-06-24 0:52 ` [9fans] 9P optimization Lyndon Nerenberg
2007-06-24 3:04 ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2007-06-24 3:15 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2007-06-24 4:08 ` ron minnich
2007-06-24 9:34 ` Steve Simon
2007-06-24 10:06 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2007-06-24 11:38 ` Steve Simon
2007-06-24 13:34 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2007-06-25 0:34 ` ron minnich
2007-06-25 17:53 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2007-06-25 1:02 ` Dave Eckhardt
2007-06-24 12:14 ` erik quanstrom
2007-06-24 13:36 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2007-06-24 21:47 ` erik quanstrom
2007-06-25 17:48 ` Lyndon Nerenberg
2007-06-25 18:46 ` erik quanstrom
2007-06-24 4:16 ` Bruce Ellis
2007-06-24 18:05 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2007-06-22 23:20 ` [9fans] About 9P Skip Tavakkolian
2007-06-22 23:48 ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2007-06-23 0:27 ` Roman Shaposhnick
2007-06-23 0:27 ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2007-06-23 12:08 ` erik quanstrom
2007-06-23 12:27 ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2007-06-23 12:57 ` Lucio De Re
2007-06-23 13:01 ` Uriel
2007-06-23 13:36 ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2007-06-23 14:27 ` Lucio De Re
2007-06-23 14:45 ` Francisco J Ballesteros
2007-06-22 21:16 ` Skip Tavakkolian
2007-06-22 21:37 ` Philippe Anel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=467C31EB.1060302@free.fr \
--to=xigh@free.fr \
--cc=9fans@cse.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).