From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <46ab6f9fa4897fa66ac1c106578893ec@iram.fr> To: 9fans@9fans.net From: "Mathieu Lonjaret" Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 11:06:29 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20100504045450.5d14892c.six@sixforty.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="upas-actqolpgeqocyulnjpwgjhimzy" Subject: Re: [9fans] 9vx and ubuntu 10.04LTS Topicbox-Message-UUID: 19789f2c-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --upas-actqolpgeqocyulnjpwgjhimzy Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Not that I know of. it's a lucid lynx install I did when it was still in beta and I haven't kept it up to date since then, so maybe that's where the difference lies. How do I check if that fix you're speaking of is installed or not? Cheers, Mathieu --upas-actqolpgeqocyulnjpwgjhimzy Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: X-Original-To: mpl@smgl.fr.eu.org Delivered-To: mpl@smgl.fr.eu.org Received: by serenity.smgl.fr.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 8C94532CFC; Tue, 4 May 2010 10:56:25 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on serenity.smgl.fr.eu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=1.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Received: from mail-iw0-f191.google.com (mail-iw0-f191.google.com [209.85.223.191]) by serenity.smgl.fr.eu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E66832CF3 for ; Tue, 4 May 2010 10:56:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: by iwn29 with SMTP id 29so4836442iwn.17 for ; Tue, 04 May 2010 01:56:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.85.205 with SMTP id p13mr2639699ibl.8.1272963361185; Tue, 04 May 2010 01:56:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Forwarded-To: mpl@smgl.fr.eu.org X-Forwarded-For: mathieu.lonjaret@gmail.com mpl@smgl.fr.eu.org Delivered-To: mathieu.lonjaret@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.31.11 with SMTP id w11cs96965ibc; Tue, 4 May 2010 01:56:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.162.85 with SMTP id u21mr436167ibx.95.1272963359789; Tue, 04 May 2010 01:55:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gouda.swtch.com (gouda.swtch.com [67.207.142.3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 7si7142592iwn.26.2010.05.04.01.55.59; Tue, 04 May 2010 01:55:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of 9fans-bounces+mathieu.lonjaret=gmail.com@9fans.net designates 67.207.142.3 as permitted sender) client-ip=67.207.142.3; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of 9fans-bounces+mathieu.lonjaret=gmail.com@9fans.net designates 67.207.142.3 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=9fans-bounces+mathieu.lonjaret=gmail.com@9fans.net Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=gouda.swtch.com) by gouda.swtch.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <9fans-bounces@9fans.net>) id 1O9Dum-0008Cm-5q; Tue, 04 May 2010 08:55:40 +0000 Received: from smtpauth04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net ([64.202.165.95]) by gouda.swtch.com with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O9Duj-0008CX-Vr for 9fans@9fans.net; Tue, 04 May 2010 08:55:38 +0000 Received: (qmail 17568 invoked from network); 4 May 2010 08:55:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (70.154.12.64) by smtpauth04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.95) with ESMTP; 04 May 2010 08:55:31 -0000 Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 04:54:50 -0400 From: sixforty To: 9fans@9fans.net Message-Id: <20100504045450.5d14892c.six@sixforty.net> In-Reply-To: References: <2d567192c754d7cdfe78dd1f4bbe8d30@terzarima.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.9; i586-slackware-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [9fans] 9vx and ubuntu 10.04LTS X-BeenThere: 9fans@9fans.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.10 Precedence: list Reply-To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> List-Id: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans.9fans.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: 9fans-bounces@9fans.net Errors-To: 9fans-bounces+mathieu.lonjaret=gmail.com@9fans.net The update to 10.04 has overloaded my email with messages from ubuntu's dosemu forum. Basically the same issue as with 9vx. A fix [sic] is suggested. So, question is: On Sat, 1 May 2010 23:36:08 +0200 "Mathieu Lonjaret" wrote: > Fwiw, 9vx does build and run fine on 10.04 here. > Lemme know if I can give you some relevant info which might help. > > Cheers, > Mathieu > Mathieu: have you perhaps applied the fix to run some emulator, and it's "fixing" 9vx? -- sixforty --upas-actqolpgeqocyulnjpwgjhimzy--