From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <471b30ebe09bf60ae8ca5e9088ddcc54@caldo.demon.co.uk>
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] ndb/local
From: Charles Forsyth <forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <38f17efea1888d18d4a1daccf5fb67ba@plan9.bell-labs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 21:27:55 +0100
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 95af8372-eacb-11e9-9e20-41e7f4b1d025

>> 16:       none    il!135.104.9.15!31936      0      0 (1,3) (-183238,976,-9024) (2585,258,125,0)

i noticed there were quite a few `none's in the list.
is this a new ploy to avoid attention from Lucent anti-HR?
a bit like Ulysses in reverse: `lay off none!'