From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <472106B6.5060004@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:12:22 -0600 From: don bailey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070816) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu> Subject: Re: [9fans] Got thread experience? References: <4549906437a668a8f1064647e6b21c64@quanstro.net> <9812253A-69A9-428E-8210-1BD804F70693@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <9812253A-69A9-428E-8210-1BD804F70693@mac.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Topicbox-Message-UUID: d986fe70-ead2-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Pietro Gagliardi wrote: > /* there are threads in plan 9 */ > Ok, let me clarify because I think people are very confused: and that's understandable given the weirdness of the question. I'm looking for any corner case operating system that (due to scheduling and other semantics) sees threads as not having the usual set of shared memory segments. I haven't found any but I'm interested in verifying because of a project at work. No, this doesn't make sense. Yes, it *should* be seen as a "process". But, I'm being extremely pedantic. D -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHIQa0yWX0NBMJYAcRApmlAJ0YiVkfsDJVvviPXMJ5nOTTsxOPeACeJGBC RwBJSz1dV800DXm4txiTwFw= =L0u2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----