From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <47430208.8030105@arcepi.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:49:28 +0100
From: Armando Camarero <arcepi@arcepi.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Slow response, was /n/sources/contrib/
References: <599f06db0711200216h33191d7tc330f2dd0029539d@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <599f06db0711200216h33191d7tc330f2dd0029539d@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 028ef994-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Gorka Guardiola escribi=F3:
> On Nov 19, 2007 5:29 PM, roger peppe <rogpeppe@gmail.com> wrote:
>  =20
>> [BTW, has anyone else been having a very slow response time from the l=
ist?
>> i only just saw that reply and it was sent 22 hours ago]
>>
>>    =20
>
> Nemo also sent a message from gmail yesterday which took some
> many hours to get there (the one on us going to the iw9p).
> Something odd is happening to the list (and gmail?).
>  =20
I'd say it has nothing to do with gmail. I sent a message too, but using=20
my own SMTP server, and got delayed for almost 20 hours.