From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <4794C20F.8070101@coraid.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:02:23 -0500
From: Brantley Coile <brantley@coraid.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Macintosh/20050716)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@cse.psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [9fans] Building GCC
References: <97e9aaea995b8830e3c4748832e3a7ef@yourdomain.dom>	<753F4A04-C113-49F9-8CC7-8C44BD10889D@mac.com>
	<E56B300E-9472-4C89-A7FD-68DA9DEF3724@mac.com>
In-Reply-To: <E56B300E-9472-4C89-A7FD-68DA9DEF3724@mac.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 32e1a86c-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Better yet, why not copy mv somewhere local to Gcc and add it
as a no-op there?  Do we really have to start seeing system
contamination from GCC in the released system?  The slope feels
slippery here.

Pietro Gagliardi wrote:
>I'll add -f to Plan 9 mv as a no-op  later.