From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <47A9DECF.2090205@gmx.de>
Date: Wed,  6 Feb 2008 17:22:39 +0100
From: Kernel Panic <cinap_lenrek@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 9fans@cse.psu.edu
Subject: Re: [9fans] next-server dhcpd option
References: <6df7e3ae828147d98c8aab18bb57650f@mteege.de>
In-Reply-To: <6df7e3ae828147d98c8aab18bb57650f@mteege.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 496fef8a-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

Matthias Teege wrote:

>Moin,
>
>
>
>>aggregate ndb that dhcpd uses.  there are various 'sleep' and ip
>>ranges options for dhcpd that might help with division of
>>responsibilities between servers.
>>
>>
>
>I have to boot some linux systems from my Plan 9 dns/dhcp/tftp server
>via PXE. Pxelinux needs a tftp server which supports the tsize option
>and I think the Plan 9 one doesn't do that. So my idea is to redirect
>the tftp requests to another tftp server via the next-server option. But
>I'm interested in any other solution.
>
>
>
i hacked that in some time ago to boot netbsd/linux from plan9:

http://9hal.ath.cx/usr/cinap_lenrek/tftpd.c
/n/sources/contrib/cinap_lenrek/tftpd.c


cinap