From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
References: <0BE4B21D-EDA9-4DF5-8515-7BA27841B3E3@corpus-callosum.com>
	<CAG3N4d-kZc_hxEhzzn4Vh=aXMsJCRPT0sugV39H_5pg6egvPfQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<D901A3E2-3282-421F-8041-B72871B9DD42@corpus-callosum.com>
From: Anthony Sorace <a@9srv.net>
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
In-Reply-To: <D901A3E2-3282-421F-8041-B72871B9DD42@corpus-callosum.com>
Message-Id: <47D4B247-AE2A-4356-9E79-21293DBCE75E@9srv.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 11:48:32 -0500
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: [9fans] APE select() and awkward Python subprocess PIPEfitting
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 2023cd2c-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Feb 26, 2013, at 10:29, Jeff Sickel <jas@corpus-callosum.com> wrote:

> 1) "You really don=E2=80=99t want to use this. It=E2=80=99s old and slow a=
nd only
>    works well on 8-bit displays."

I believe that's about the old X11 port. fgb's equis is much newer and nicer=
 (aside from, y'know, X11). That's the one forest against (for anyone who's g=
oing to try).=