From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <484992b264bcf7c6d77a5db321e1d275@quanstro.net>
From: erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:59:05 -0400
To: 9fans@9fans.net
In-Reply-To: <aa7e41150907161139r443e3d2bmc052d14fd76a5de3@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] intel gma 950 graphics
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 238cf8ba-ead5-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Thu Jul 16 14:41:24 EDT 2009, crossd@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 1:54 PM, erik quanstrom<quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
> > to be precise, this is not 950 graphics:
> >
> > 0.2.0:  vid  03.00.00 8086/2772  10 0:fe980000 524288 1:0000cc01 16 2:e0000008 268435456 3:fe940000 262144
> >        Intel Corporation 82945G/GZ Integrated Graphics Device
>
> Hmm, perhaps I am confused (it wouldn't be the first time).  My
> understanding was that the 82945G implements the GMA950 chipset.  Come
> to think of it, I'm not entirely sure why I thought that?

you're not confused, i was.

http://compare.intel.com/PCC/showchart.aspx?mmID=923,919&familyID=6&culture=en-US

- erik