From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <4877238C.5040808@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:10:36 +0200
From: Kernel Panic <cinap_lenrek@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080313 SeaMonkey/1.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
References: <13426df10807100936l14a08d45n714428b086897d65@mail.gmail.com>	<c1e8ba590a5a3e67c79a8009133004fe@gmx.de>
	<13426df10807101250kf52373dufd2423bad1ae6586@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <13426df10807101250kf52373dufd2423bad1ae6586@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [9fans] why not Lvx for Plan 9?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e33ed4fa-ead3-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

ron minnich wrote:
> futex?
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Futex
> so do we need a futtocks device?
>
i think this can be implemented without
any additional devices... wtf?!
> ron
>
cinap