Re: [9fans] several things

[Kernel Panic <cinap_lenrek@gmx.de>]

erik quanstrom wrote:
>>> Are these limitations listed in some document?
>>>
>> I don't believe they are.
>>
>> It might bve nice to think there are no arbitary limits in plan9
>> as the GNU mantra, however there are not many and personally,
>> working with remote servers with very long paths, I have never
>> (knowingly) hit this limit.
>>
>> Having said this we could probably afford to up the size of pwd's
>> buffer to, say, 8k to be sixteen times as sure.
>>
>
> if you're going to all that trouble, why not make sure?
> (i don't think this is worth it, personally, but if you do ...)
>
> #include <u.h>
> #include <libc.h>
>
> void
> main(void)
> {
> 	char *p;
> 	int n, s;
>
> 	for(s = 128; ; s <<= 1){
> 		p = malloc(s);
> 		if(p == nil)
> 			sysfatal("malloc");
> 		p[s-1] = 1;
> 		if((getwd(p, s)) == 0)
> 			sysfatal("pwd: %r");
> 		if(p[s-1] == 1)
> 			break;
> 	}
> 	print("%s\n", p);
> 	exits(0);
> }
>
> - erik
>
>
AAArgg!!!1111 We leak for a fraction of micro seconds! we should
do realloc() here of course and free() the memory before exits()
just to make it even more complex ;-)

cinap